Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 201 - 220 of 8,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm by Mark D. Rasch
Accordingly, because Plaintiff’s complaint does not plausibly allege duty, the claim for Negligence (Count IV) and Gross Negligence (Count V) must be dismissed. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Eugene Volokh
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Brian Greer
In 2015, it was former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s use of a private email server. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am by Benjamin Goh
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
There are carveouts for dual U.S. citizens and green card holders, but other lawfully present Chinese nationals face further restrictions. [read post]
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:59 pm by Nathan Lee and Daniel Yannuzzi
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]