Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 221 - 240
of 8,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2023, 3:41 am
For example, in Amgen v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:20 am
See SpaceX v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Holder decision of 2013 gutted a key tool used to ensure state voting laws do not violate the VRA. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Shiv Sidharth v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Another is Barone v Sowers, 128 AD3d 484, 10 N.Y.S.3d 2 [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
It is in this context that the SRB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:55 am
By Suzanne CosgroveKalshiEX LLC, a regulated designated contract market that offers event contracts, sued the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in federal court Wednesday, challenging the Commission’s September 2023 order that prohibits Kalshi from listing its controversial Congressional Control Contracts (KalshiEX LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
And in Holder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
For instance, Article 7 instructively highlights that states must “consult and take into account the self-expressed needs, knowledge, expertise and perspectives of rights holders,” and “guarantee effective and institutionalized public participation and deliberation mechanisms which are accessible to everyone, in order to meet its human rights obligation of respecting and ensuring meaningful and effective participation. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
Holder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
The last is that of post-colonial and post-imperial national orders brought to its current state of expression in the bodies of states liberated from the formal domination of other states a lifetime ago (measured by the life span of a human) and expressed through the magisterium of that is the constant state of oppression against which all national existence is gauged. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:12 am
(Jobiak LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Holder v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
There is nothing an EU regulation could lawfully (and without violating international trade agreements) do to prevent patent holders like 3G Licensing from enforcing their rights in the United States, where damages verdicts can become costly for infringers. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:12 pm
However, in Holder v. [read post]
