Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 261 - 280
of 8,218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 1:02 pm
Desai, Lee v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
" Registration also enables the trademark holder "to stop the importation into the United States of articles bearing an infringing mark. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 8:13 am
Twitter; PragerU v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
In 2015, it was former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s use of a private email server. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm
Section 137 of the Criminal Code states that everyone who: Fabricating evidence 137. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
The recent case, MS & Sons Hospitality, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State Pistol & Rifle Ass'n. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court decided the case of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In its recent decision in Stream TV Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am
Last year, former GuestKat Jan Jacobi reported both the Warsaw District Court’s Referral to the CJEU and AG Rantos’ Opinion on the TB v Castorama Polska and Knor litigation (see IPKat posts here and here). [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
There are carveouts for dual U.S. citizens and green card holders, but other lawfully present Chinese nationals face further restrictions. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:57 am
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:59 pm
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a unanimous decision in the case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:45 am
Oral arguments in this case (Chevron v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As in the years after Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:50 am
” If it’s not an ERISA plan, medical providers have no lien at all; it’s an old case called Schweiss v Sisters of Mercy, because you can’t assign a personal injury case. [read post]
