Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 281 - 300
of 8,236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
It is in this context that the SRB v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
In advance of the Sporting Chance Forum, part of the United Nations’ yearlongcommemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) United Nations Special Procedures mandate holders call on States, international sports associations, sportspersons, and other stakeholders to protect and respect international human rights law and standards in the field of sports, without discrimination of any kind. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:55 am
By Suzanne CosgroveKalshiEX LLC, a regulated designated contract market that offers event contracts, sued the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in federal court Wednesday, challenging the Commission’s September 2023 order that prohibits Kalshi from listing its controversial Congressional Control Contracts (KalshiEX LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
And in Holder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
For instance, Article 7 instructively highlights that states must “consult and take into account the self-expressed needs, knowledge, expertise and perspectives of rights holders,” and “guarantee effective and institutionalized public participation and deliberation mechanisms which are accessible to everyone, in order to meet its human rights obligation of respecting and ensuring meaningful and effective participation. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
Holder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
The last is that of post-colonial and post-imperial national orders brought to its current state of expression in the bodies of states liberated from the formal domination of other states a lifetime ago (measured by the life span of a human) and expressed through the magisterium of that is the constant state of oppression against which all national existence is gauged. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:12 am
(Jobiak LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Holder v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
There is nothing an EU regulation could lawfully (and without violating international trade agreements) do to prevent patent holders like 3G Licensing from enforcing their rights in the United States, where damages verdicts can become costly for infringers. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:12 pm
However, in Holder v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:57 am
Sonos Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:47 pm
OpenAI relies on the precedent set in Authors Guild v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:20 am
The US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
I.e. member states could delay the effectiveness of this provision to the year 2525 if they so desire. [read post]
