Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 281 - 300 of 8,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Weigel
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am by Michael C. Dorf
That everyone includes holders of bonds issued before the government hit the debt ceiling, so they would not be injured. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States as well as in Germany, claim construction is resolved by courts as a question of law (not fact). [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:11 am by sgabriele
By Sarah Gabriele On April 27, 2023, the European Commission proposed new legislation that would allow companies to make drugs without the patent holder’s consent in emergency situations. [read post]
SEP holders’ innovation incentives The second claim is that SEP holders’ innovation incentives would diminish significantly, or even disappear, if their net royalty income decreased. [read post]
Case date: 09 March 2023 Case number: No. 22-1907 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
The case ultimately ruled in Google’s favor, stating that the project was transformative and constituted fair use. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:04 am by Dr. Laura McGuire, Guest Contributor
As a supervisor or social superior (mentors, contract holders v. contractors, clients who need our help), our ask is often met with token compliance or a yes that is rooted in fearing negative consequences, e.g., will they fire me/end the contract/not represent me. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
  As stated in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Erie Sand & Gravel Ltd. v. [read post]
In other words, it would create significant red tape and compliance costs in an attempt to address an issue that is mostly peripheral to the stated aims, and arguably already dealt with by EU courts in Huawei v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am by Shaiba Rather
If you’re an immigrant or visa-holder in the United States and believe you’ve been affected by this social media monitoring, the ACLU wants to hear your story. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am by Florian Mueller
Defendants from the automotive and telecommunications industries sometimes have approximately ten suppliers (example: Nokia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
It is identifiable by third parties in that only the holder of a private key is able to access and transfer the cryptocurrency from one wallet to another. [read post]