Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in Para 21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:02 pm
The notice must state that any holder of the contract is subject to all claims and defenses the consumer could assert against the seller of the financed goods or services, and that the consumer’s “recovery [under the contract] shall not exceed amounts paid by the debtor [under the contract]. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 4:15 am
In Nguyen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
Wasserman Rajec* In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
So he's had seven additional years in the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” Caldwell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:36 pm
Holder responded in a letter to the appeals court judges in Physician Hospitals of America v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
And it just doesn't seem like a tenable situation to have the United States say: "If you're on the list, even if we're wrong, there's nothing you can do about it. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm
(Rittenhouse v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
That someone who the INS knows is present in the United States without authorization would have things resolved in, oh, I don't know, under two decades.Not so, apparently.Impressive on all fronts.P.S. - The Ninth Circuit grants Chay's petition in part and remands. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Especially when, as here, they're time-sensitive matters in which delay constitutes a substantial downside itself.It's even worse in this particular case, because the Ninth Circuit ends up doing exactly what the United States asked it to do over three years ago when it filed a motion to remand the case to the BIA. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm
Holder 13-1301 Issue: (1) Whether the biological basis for sex discrimination articulated in Nguyen v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 1:47 pm
Of course, the states and tribes do not receive a lot of sympathy from private patent holders whose patents are subject to IPRs. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
Recently, in GEICO v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 8:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:23 pm
In Pearson Education v. [read post]