Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 401 - 420 of 8,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2010, 7:44 am by christopher
United States, 144 U.S. 47, 59 (1892)United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:01 pm
  The district court held patent exhaustion was not an independent cause of action but instead a defense to an infringement claim, and dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction so any state law claims could be pursued in state court.The Federal Circuit affirmed, observing the case met neither of the criteria for § 1338(a) jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's decision in Christianson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
   In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
EnglishBingoTicket.jpg In copyright action, trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence that copyright holder had engaged in illegal operations (by distributing an online bingo game in violation of state law) since the evidence "might improperly influence the jury to reduce the statutory damages award," in Dream Games of Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by Zachary Spilman
Judge Stucky, writing for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 1:17 pm by Arkady Itkin
In Rajaram v Meta Platforms, Inc. (2024), an employee sued Meta for giving a hiring preference to H1B visa holders over US Citizens. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Steven Eversole
Per 13A-12-211, any unlawful distribution of a controlled substance of Schedules I through V is considered a Class B felony. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
Per 13A-12-211, any unlawful distribution of a controlled substance of Schedules I through V is considered a Class B felony. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:53 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
The Ninth Circuit granted the Petition for Review in Singh v Holder, specifically finding that the IJ/BIA's credibility findings were not supported by the record. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Peter Reap
C&D Zodiac, Inc, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1496, 03 October 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 10:20 pm by LindaMBeale
  The Ninth Circuit found a Catch-22 for secret account holders in a case,  In re Grand Jury Investigation M.H. v. [read post]