Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 421 - 440 of 8,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
PRACTICE NOTE: Foreign copyright holders with substantial business in the United States should obtain U.S. copyright registrations to avail themselves of all remedies under the Copyright Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
§ 602(a)(1).That section provides that importing goods into the United States without the authority of the copyright holder is illegal. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:57 am
The Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments yesterday (Nov. 10, 2009) on the issue of whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Beginning with the landmark 2015 decision by the European Court of Justice in Huawei v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Claudia V. Colón García-Moliner
Fola Coal Company, LLC, No. 161024 (4th Cir., 1/04/2017), the permit holder is noncompliant. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 pm
Holder that states with a long history of racial discrimination no longer needed to approve any proposed changes to their voting procedures with the federal government, as had long been required under the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:07 am
Holder [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a person convicted under state law for simple drug possession, a federal law misdemeanor, has not been "convicted" of an "aggravated felony" for immigration removal purposes. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
However, the certificate of designation for the class also stated that holders of the preferred stock had "no voting rights. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]