Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 101 - 120 of 8,014
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
  Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
The bill also triggers the omnipresent challenge of state-level Internet regulations: how does the service know who is a Minnesota resident? [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court serially ruled that the petitioner stated sufficient grounds to dissolve Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am by Neil Wilkof
It will be interesting to see whether the rights-holders in the names HENRY and RONALDINHO, or in the badges of their respective football clubs, will file an opposition. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
If it becomes clear that sanctions will not induce compliance, they must cease (although “civil” confinement for disobedience of a state court’s order once lasted 14 years). [read post]
2 May 2022, 9:12 pm by Unknown
Holder, NY Slip Op 02778 (2d Dep't April 27, 2022)Here is the decision. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:55 am by jonathanturley
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
It was held that the previous judge was correct in stating that dishonesty could not properly be alleged by adding the knowledge of one innocent person to another (citing Armstrong v Strain [1952] 1 K.B 232 and Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91 (Ch)). [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:45 pm by Samuel Bray
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 (2009); Weinberger v. [read post]