Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 141 - 160 of 7,981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In Tradesman Program Managers, LLC v Doyle, decided earlier this month by the Appellate Division, First Department, the court affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea Masley rejecting the tax estoppel argument made by the putative holder (JCB) of an 18.75% membership interest in an LLC. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:48 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
Substantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that another company, and not the trademark holder, actually used the mark in commerce. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:17 am by John L. Culhane, Jr.
  The FTC states that the Holder Rule does not eliminate any rights that a consumer may have as a matter of separate state or federal law. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:32 am
In the past, when spouses have gone to court to try to force the stock option holder to exercise the option, the court has refused. [read post]
The purpose of these state-based lawsuits were to uncover the naked identity of the ISP subscriber / account holders’ true identity without requiring a subpoena from a “John Doe Subscriber” lawsuit in a Federal Court. [read post]
The purpose of these state-based lawsuits were to uncover the naked identity of the ISP subscriber / account holders’ true identity without requiring a subpoena from a “John Doe Subscriber” lawsuit in a Federal Court. [read post]