Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 141 - 160 of 8,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Conflicts of Interest New Item 1603(b) requires the SPAC to disclose any actual or potential material conflict of interest between (1) the sponsor or its affiliates or the SPAC’s officers, directors or promoters, and (2) unaffiliated security holders of the SPAC. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
You represent a large equity holder in the debtor’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:44 am by Unknown
Instead, the contract terms governed, and the claims were barred by a "no-action" clause (Chatham Capital Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: takings: Sony rootkit is installed, and you’re not allowed to remove it because of the power of the state; similar to Loretto v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  For present purposes, however, the important point to understand is that Trump’s primary merits argument, to which he devotes the first 13 pages of the Argument section of his brief (pp. 20-33), concerns only the second, middle “Officials Clause,” which identifies the current and former office-holders to whom Section 3 potentially applies, rather than the government positions that an insurrectionist or rebel is ineligible to occupy going forward. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ark. 2019) (stating that “[t]he fact that the [confidentiality] Agreement does not state a time limitation, but instead applies forever, further supports a finding that it is unenforceable”); Howard Schultz & Assocs. v. [read post]