Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 161 - 180 of 8,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 6:44 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Danielle Kays and James Nasiri Seyfarth Synopsis: In February 2023, the Illinois Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion in Cothron v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
In the near term, there is nothing that Apple has to fear from the enforcement of SEPs in EU Member States. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Holder, the 2013 case that narrowed the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:34 am by Rick Hasen
Sam Levine and Kira Lerner for The Guardian: In 2013, the US supreme court gutted the pre-clearance requirement in a landmark case called Shelby county v Holder. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The US fair use provision states: …. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
” According to these courts, Bruen described the holders of Second Amendment rights as ordinary law-abiding citizens “no fewer than fourteen times. [read post]