Search for: "State v. Hollingsworth" Results 41 - 60 of 412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Gavin Newsom of California, who is in the public gallery as he was two years ago for Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm by Ingrid Gherman
Windsor, which struck down the federal Defense of Marriage Act under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and Hollingsworth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:41 am by Steve Vladeck
A big thanks to Will Baude for alerting me to yesterday's fascinating decision by the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Sergio J. Campos
The question of who can assert the state’s interests arose again recently in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The answer was not immediately clear, particularly as the Court issued a ruling the very same day in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
Supreme Court’s standing ruling in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:30 pm by Andrew Brasher
The Court’s decision to duck this constitutional question in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
Hollingsworth, it's literally impossible to believe that the justices do not regularly take consequences into account in deciding what they do. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 12:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
In fact, the Kentucky petition urged the Court to take on the issue now “to settle the question first presented in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:13 am
  As a comment on Professor Dorf's post yesterday noted, the trial in a federal court in California that resulted in a ruling that Prop 8 is unconstitutional (affirmed, sort of, in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:49 am by Jeff Sovern
The lower courts ordered the school to admit him and by the time the Supreme Court heard the case, he was on the verge of graduating:   Did they not teach you By your third year of law school That your case is moot   And one about the Court's 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by John Neiman
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]