Search for: "State v. Hollywood" Results 1 - 20 of 902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 5:46 am by Ray Dowd
   My post linking to the video of the hearing en banc here.Yesterday, in Montz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 12:16 pm
This morning we read in the Hollywood Reporter, Esq., about a case in California state court captioned Hirsch Wallerstein Hayum Matlof & Fishman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:31 am by Becky L. Kalas, FordHarrison
Honestly, since at least 1979, when “V’ger” encountered Captain Kirk and the starship Enterprise, Hollywood has been helping AI figure out ways to live in harmony with its human creators, overthrow them when it can’t, and find meaning in its existence. [read post]
17 May 2018, 11:02 am by Kevin
  My source stated that he “probably would have let Huang v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm by Joe Mullin
The studios' goal was to quickly get pirated content off the Web; unhappy about the state of Google's voluntary compliance with their demands and frustrated in their efforts at passing new federal law such as SOPA and PIPA, the MPAA has turned instead to state law enforcement. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Contrast that to the Court’s more recent decision in MGM v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  Justice Brennan, dissenting from the 5-4 opinion in Abel v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:36 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Evans, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2243 (04 November 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MM (Iran) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1167 (10 November 2009) Choudhary & Ors v Bhatter & Ors [2009] EWCA Civ 510 (11 November 2009) Whittle Movers Ltd v Hollywood Express Ltd [2009] [...] [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
Because, as our Hollywood car accident lawyers know, South Carolina had been one of a handful of states - Florida included - that allows insurers to contain a clause in their policy that lowers limits to state minimums for permissive drivers. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:35 pm
In a decision relevant to redevelopment agencies and other public entities involved in the disposition of land for development, the California Supreme Court held in Save Tara v. [read post]