Search for: "State v. Holman"
Results 21 - 40
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2008, 2:15 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals distinguished this case factually from the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision in Holman v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:13 am
As someone who reads (or at least scans) virtually every family law report that is freely published online, I all too frequently come across financial remedies cases that involve "litigation that loses all sense of costs proportionality", to use the words once spoken by Mr Justice Holman. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:36 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:21 am
The application was heard by Mr Justice Holman, who found:1. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:54 am
Holman v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 5:35 pm
Prakash, Tempest in an Empty Teapot: Why the Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering Colleen V. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:54 pm
Supreme Court rules in the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:51 pm
This is the same protocol that was at issue in Glossip v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:45 am
An example of this appears in the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Genentech v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
The opinion, Prometheus v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
The 11th Circuit ruling in Arthur v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 8:27 am
By Chris Holman A couple days ago Dennis posted a nice review of the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in CareDx v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 3:27 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Velev, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2162 (12 September 2008) Thomas, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2151 (18 September 2008) Saldana, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2154 (23 September 2008) Belaid, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2153 (23 September 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1080 (24 September 2008) Deutsche Bank AG & Ors v Asia Pacific Broadband… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
Bilski v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
Revel, Enzo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 5:58 am
Mr Justice Holman ordered a temporary stay of the consent order.It will be noted that the wife played no part in the above drama. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:35 am
The 11th Circuit ruling in Arthur v. [read post]
