Search for: "State v. Holman"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Warden, Holman Corr. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:51 pm
This is the same protocol that was at issue in Glossip v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 8:00 am
John Stuckey, as Attorney-in-Fact for Robert Holman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Paola V. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:00 am
Paola V. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
Importantly, Professors Rebecca Eisenberg and Christopher Holman state that a possible explanation for this distinction by the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm
Jacobson Holman, PLLC, (E.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm
Jacobson Holman, PLLC, (E.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
United States, 134 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 2014). [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
Mr Justice HolmanA summary of Murphy v Murphy [2014] EWHC 2263 (Fam), decided by Mr Justice Holman on the 4th of July.As he states at the beginning of his judgment, the situation faced by Mr Justice Holman in this case was a somewhat unusual one. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 11:09 pm
Full post: suesspiciousminds.Secret decision to removeSuesspiciousminds examines A Local Authority v C 2013 [above], in this post.Reporting restriction orderThere is a new Reporting Restriction Order case up – Re TM [2013] EWHC 4043 [above], decided by Holman J. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
