Search for: "State v. Hooper" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
 Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm by Unknown
(Defamation; Nuisance: Counterclaims) United States v. [read post]
According to the Creek Nation’s complaint, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided that the city lacks criminal jurisdiction over such cases in Hooper v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Department of Interior (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Internal Affairs of Tribes) Hooper v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: Digital initiative sets out to improve tribal and governmental relations American Indian policy innovator passes away at age 81 Indigenous students fight tribal regalia bans Tracking efforts to pass state-level ICWA laws Maine governor vetoes proposal sought by tribes to ensure they benefit from federal laws Tenth Circuit Court upholds tribal sovereignty in… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
The state dismissed Hooper’s contention as “totally baseless. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Court of Appeals alluded to this drafting solution in Sage, writing at the end of its opinion that “inclusion of clear language stating that the prevailing party is entitled to recover attorneys’ fees in an action between the parties would avoid potential litigation on the issue. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by NARF
Frey (Maine Indian Settlement Acts; Reservation Boundaries) United States v. [read post]