Search for: "State v. Hoopes" Results 1 - 20 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
  This question was recently answered by the District Court of Oregon in Jacobus Rentmeester v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Maryland, like many states, creates a lot of hoops that plaintiffs need to jump through in order to bring medical malpractice case. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm by Allard Knook
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of the Treaty was to achieve… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
And these folks will not be from just the United States, they’ll be from all over the world. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:37 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
”  In other words, it is asking the Court to create another procedural hoop for the states to jump through. [read post]