Search for: "State v. Howell" Results 421 - 440 of 623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 3:24 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Advocate General advises ECJ in Interflora keyword reference: Interflora v Marks & Spencer (Class 46) (IPKat) (ArsTechnica) District Court Columbia: Former RIAA lobbyist Judge Beryl Howell green lights BitTorrent user mass-harassment scheme: Call of the Wild v Does 1 – 1,062; Maverick v Does 1 – 4,350; Donkeyball v 1 – 171 (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (ArsTechnica) (TorrentFreak) (Internet Cases) Danish… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Eugene Volokh has a post on the recent decision of the US Court of Appeals of the 5th Circuit in the case of Block v Tanenhaus [pdf] which concerns libel by quotation out of context. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Thus, in Howell, plaintiffs could not recover as past medical expenses amounts in excess of sums actually paid by or on behalf of the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
 In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:08 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 2:41 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Bailey, 644 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio 1994) (statements to police officer); Howell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]