Search for: "State v. Hudson" Results 81 - 100 of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
In State v Green, the Appellate Division held that the the Stalker Lidar speed measurement device has not yet shown to be scientifically reliable. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a new paradigm through which… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:30 am by Native American Rights Fund
Jewell (tribe's assignment of land to members)    * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: Native Village of Tununak v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
Terminated individual must repay salary received while his appeal was pending arbitrationRensselaer County v Hudson Valley Community College Faculty Association, Appellate Division, Third Dept., 262 AD2d 843, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 4 NY2d 753In the Hudson Valley case, the Appellate Division decided that an arbitrator had the power to require a faculty member to repay the college for the salary it had paid to him while an appeal of his dismissal was pending… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:09 am by Ilya Somin
In addition, the other states could try to establish standing by relying on the broad theories of state standing endorsed by the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
 Chris DeMuth, a Fellow at the Hudson Institute, recently wrote Can the Administrative State be Tamed? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]