Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 121 - 140 of 1,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:41 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
ComptonCitizenship, Gender, and Conscience: United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
We’re returning to the topic of implied Buckman preemption today to discuss three recent decisions, Hughes v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
In the absence of actual harm, privacy cases are hardly worth pursuing http://t.co/6RYcmFS01Q -> United States: Nudity, Privacy and the Prostitute – Susan Brenner http://t.co/8r3oTanQVT -> Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson http://t.co/qHm27iucpC -> Web Site Accessibility Standards in Ontario http://t.co/5GkvGyebgZ -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-23: Computer… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
There were no school rules prohibiting running in the walkway; a point noted by the trial judge His Honour Judge Iain Hughes. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:57 pm by Will Baude
Towards the end of his post this morning, Richard brings up an interesting issue that arose during arguments in Hughes v. [read post]