Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:16 pm
IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC, IMH Financial Corporation, Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., IMH Holdings, LLC, IMH Management Services, LLC, Shane Albers, William Meris and Steven Darak (the "IMH Defendants"), before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the "Wood Action"), as well as an application to enjoin the vote from proceeding. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 pm
IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC, IMH Financial Corporation, Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., IMH Holdings, LLC, IMH Management Services, LLC, Shane Albers, William Meris and Steven Darak (the "IMH Defendants"), before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the "Wood Action"), as well as an application to enjoin the vote from proceeding. [read post]
When Is an Interest in a California Real Estate Syndicate a “Security” Under State and Federal Laws?
5 Jun 2017, 4:58 pm
Supreme Court decided Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
See Gallup v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
The alleged scheme called for discounted shares to be sold to the investors through various shell corporations. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:58 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:45 am
In its January 10, 2012 opinion in CompuCredit v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:30 am
Circuit is constructing should be understood to place serious limits on laws that compel corporations to disclose corporate social responsibility information, regardless of which way the court decides NAM v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:06 pm
Allen was prescient when he stated in the famous 1988 Delaware Chancery Court case of Blasius Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:55 am
Aug. 8, 2024), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a securities class action brought by investors who purchased shares of the special purpose acquisition company Churchill Capital Corporation IV (“CCIV”) in early 2021 before it merged with Atieva, Inc. d/b/a Lucid Motors (“Lucid”) in July 2021. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
In Creative Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
In Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm
" The only real limitation is that the company state in advance that this is the goal before investors invest. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:25 pm
I have three main comments: First, this is a pivotal time in American securities and corporate law jurisprudence. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
Georgia Professor Elizabeth Chamblee Burch has an essay out for the University of Cincinnati's Corporate Law Symposium, in which she argues that institutional investors may have problems serving as adequate class representatives in securities class actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm
On February 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that employees complaining of securities or other corporate fraud under the Dodd-Frank Act must first go to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to receive anti-retaliation protections. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
Consistent with that theme, many governments are paying more attention to the national security implications of corporate transactions involving foreign investors (e.g. the Huawei/5G network debate). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
Bainbridge, Securities Law: Insider Trading 15-16 (2d ed. 2007), cited in Pfeiffer v. [read post]
