Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am
New York’s Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) remains a major player, and regulators from a number of states have taken action, particularly with respect to data privacy and security. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:01 am
Levin v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
Levinson would represent the most radical change in the private enforcement of the federal securities law in a generation and would be a severe blow to investors' rights." [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
In Markette v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
See SEC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:13 pm
In Kirschner v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
RBS Securities Inc.Case number: 13-cv-01643 (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut)Case filed: November 7, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: November 25, 2013 12/20/2013 03/20/2014 2013-115 SEC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:40 am
A 1987 New York Court of Appeals decision, CPC International, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
In Binning v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 4, 2019 Tags: Arbitrage, Boards of Directors, Deal protection, Engagement, Mergers & acquisitions, REITs, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value Fiduciary Blind Spot: The Failure of Institutional Investors to Prevent the Illegitimate Use of Working Americans’ Savings for Corporate Political Spending Posted by Tami… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Section 1453(d) states explicitly that CAFA does not provide a basis for removal of actions that involve solely “covered securities,” internal corporate governance under state law, or fiduciary duties related to securities. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Contents include:Case CommentsHans van Houtte & Bridie McAsey, Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims Andrea Marco Steingruber, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Consent in Large-scale Arbitration Proceedings Céline Lévesque, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment Samuel Wordsworth, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Pre-conditions to… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In Frank v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Clayton stated: "When investors are offered and sold securities - which to date ICOs have largely been - they are entitled to the benefits of state and federal securities laws and sellers and other market participants must follow these laws. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
In levying the largest financial penalty ever imposed by the SRO, FINRA stated that the sanctions reflect the scope and seriousness of Robinhood’s violations, which affected millions of customers. [read post]
