Search for: "State v. Irvin" Results 1 - 20 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On 8 April 2025, the ECtHR handed down judgement in the case of Green v The United Kingdom (Application no. 22077/19). [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am by INFORRM
Rather than creating a “backdoor” to comply, Apple withdrew ADP from the UK market, stating it would not compromise its security features and expressing disappointment at the decision. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:00 am by John Coyle
Vázquez (Georgetown University Law Center) Christopher A. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Elevating a thirty-year-old taxonomy first articulated by Chief Justice Irvin in Stepetin v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Ari Glogower (Northwestern; Google Scholar) presents Apportioned Direct Taxes (with Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar) at UC-Irvine today as part of its Tax Law & Policy Colloquium hosted by Natascha Fastabend: In the 2024 case of Moore v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
In 2000, he wrote the opinion in People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 2:54 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Ergul said in his plea agreement that in June 2022 – following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Judge Wright puts it plainly stating that ICE's practice can be more accurately termed "knock and arrests" and "violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Tensions have escalated and arrests have been made as protesters continue to stake out areas on the campuses of UC Irvine, UC Riverside, Occidental College, Sacramento State, San Francisco State, Cal Poly Humboldt and others. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]