Search for: "State v. Jacoby" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 10:48 am by lennyesq
Siudzinski represented the state in Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:43 am by Keith L. Miller
 In Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, a client was injured in a rear-end car accident and subsequently retained a lawyer to represent him in a case against the other driver. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:30 am
Here are their answers to a question on church-state separation, and here are their responses to a question about Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag offer an initial big-picture analysis of all the oral arguments in the current term. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
Acquisition of a private entity by a public employerNeron v NYC Health and Hospitals Corp., Supreme Court [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]In January 1998, New York State Supreme Court Justice Shainswit considered a personnel issue that is rarely litigated -- the status of individuals who work for a private employer having a contract with a public entity to provide certain services and later become employees of that public entity. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed at CNN, Tamar Jacoby contends that if the Court upholds the law, both the Obama Administration and it should “open the door as widely as possible” to the states in the hope that “their experimentation . . . may point the way for Congress.”  [read post]