Search for: "State v. Jacoby" Results 1 - 20 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Tonja Jacobi (Emory University School of Law) & Riley Clafton (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) have posted The Law of Disposable Children: Interrogations in Schools (Forthcoming, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 75, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:48 am by lennyesq
Siudzinski represented the state in Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:43 am by Keith L. Miller
 In Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, a client was injured in a rear-end car accident and subsequently retained a lawyer to represent him in a case against the other driver. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:30 am
Here are their answers to a question on church-state separation, and here are their responses to a question about Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
"A call for separation of school and state": Today in The Boston Globe, columnist Jeff Jacoby has an op-ed that begins, "Whatever else might be said about it, US District Judge Mark Wolf's decision in Parker v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Last year brought estate v. estate attorney legal malpractice after the Schneider decision in the Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm by Ilya Somin
First, Jacoby's restricts not only federal power to bar migrants but also that of the states. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag offer an initial big-picture analysis of all the oral arguments in the current term. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by John Steele
 At oral argument, the Second Circuit Panel, consisting of Judges Lynch, Walker and Gleeson, appeared to paint the parties into a corner, first eliciting a representation from Jacoby & Meyers that it decided not to challenge the New York statutes out of concern that the district court might abstain from deciding the case (under Railroad Commission v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm by cf
This agreement simplifies state tax systems, removes burdens to interstate commerce that are defined in the United States Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:12 am by John Hochfelder
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (1st Dept. 2021), the appellate court reinstated the $3,000,000 pain and suffering award. [read post]