Search for: "State v. Jacoby" Results 21 - 40 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
Head, Lieutenant General Charles Jacoby, and United States, Appellees. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am by Conor McEvily
  In an op-ed at CNN, Tamar Jacoby contends that if the Court upholds the law, both the Obama Administration and it should “open the door as widely as possible” to the states in the hope that “their experimentation . . . may point the way for Congress. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals recently, in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” Roberts: “Well, can the tribe be sued in state court? [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Jacoby, had filed an affidavit explaining how crucial total isolation was to Padilla's interrogation; it shows that Padilla is not simply making up the allegations. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]