Search for: "State v. James"
Results 181 - 200
of 10,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am
The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the rejection of the sound and stated in its reasoning that the sign was not 'catchy' enough to stand out from the already existing jingles and did not fulfil the origin function of a trade mark. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kevin C. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kevin C. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm
Another classmate, Emily Podolnick, responded to the Teitiota v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am
The Long and Storied History of Special Counsels in the United States During the first day of arguments, prosecutor James Pearce noted most of the courts agree with the special counsel: Eight judges unanimously rejected the notion that attorneys general lack the power to appoint special counsels in four separate criminal cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:52 am
The latest is U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
In her recent concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
United States) and presidential immunity (Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 3:00 pm
"] From People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In its recent case, FDA v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:43 pm
James W. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Oren Tamir (University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of McKnight v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted Moral Reality as a Guide to Original Meaning: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
From Stein v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Statute stating that “any judgment . . . shall . . . bear post-judgment interest” requires interest on entire judgment, including any portion consisting of pre-judgment interest. [read post]