Search for: "State v. James" Results 421 - 440 of 10,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 5:38 pm
United States, and said retired engineer James S. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 10:59 pm
No. 07A630 Title: James Callahan, Applicant [www.supremecourtus.gov] v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:13 am
iStock_000000100546_L2.jpg Eighth Circuit considers the admissibility of a statement under the "res gestae" doctrine, in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:00 am
STATE OF IOWA, POLK COUNTY CLERK OF COURT Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, James M. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am by Mark Sorkin
” In the piece Will gave prominent attention to his colleagues and fellow travelers Heather Macdonald and James Q. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
In response James Eadie QC states that withdrawal need not be a joint effort but, if it must be, Parliament’s decision to pass the European Union Referendum Act 2015 is sufficient cooperation with the Government. 14.33: James Eadie QC states “The Government has the constitutional responsibility and ability… to make and ratify treaties. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:49 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
Judge James Beaty of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina has denied, at least in part, the motions to dismiss in Evans v. [read post]