Search for: "State v. Janson" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
In 2003, LegalZoom received a “cease and desist” order from the North Carolina State Bar on the basis that its non-licensed “legal technicians” were actively involved in document review and preparation.[12] The Missouri Federal Court later upheld the order on a motion for summary judgment, agreeing that LegalZoom’s platform went beyond a “do-it-yourself” service and crossed the boundary of unauthorized practice.[13] The result of the federal court… [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Licciardi Construction Co., 562 A.2d 913, 916 (1989); Janson v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am by The Legal Blog
Hardly ever has the voice of the timorous spoken more clearly and loudly than in these words of Lord Davey in Janson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:52 pm by Daniel S. Swinton, Esq.
In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:50 pm by Trademark Attorney
Perhaps dissatisfied with the service, Janson filed a petition against Legalzoom in the District court of Cole County, Missouri titled Todd Janson on Behalf of Himself and all other Missourians similarly Situated v. [read post]