Search for: "State v. Jarvis"
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 6:08 am
The post AARON JARVIS v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:17 am
The post TIMOTHY DWAN JARVIS v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Jarvis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:52 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight Jarvis Coleman-Fuller, appellant, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Washington County of possession of heroin and possession of cocaine. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Second-degree murder After a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Brandon Jarvis Heigh, appellant, was convicted of second-degree murder.1 He was sentenced to incarceration for a term of 30 years. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
The decision, R. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:00 am
Supreme Court has ended the saga of Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:59 am
Here is the opinion in Jarvis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:07 am
On June 6, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Jarvis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:10 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:18 am
Webb v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:14 pm
The petition of the day is: Jarvis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 2:35 pm
Frank Jarvis Atwood. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:55 pm
By James KachmarIn Jarvis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
”Citing the State’s “strong public policy” that disputes be heard “on the merits,” and given that she had demonstrated the existence of a “potentially meritorious defense” to the litigation, the AT1 thought that the court below had “providently exercised its discretion,” and left the outcome undisturbed.Apparently, the complaint made reference to unpaid rent due under a residential lease that had expired back on May 31, 2017, and… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 1:55 pm
Sometimes amici get a nice shout-out, as has happened twice now in two days:First, in yesterday's big 9th Circuit HI v. [read post]
