Search for: "State v. Johnson"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
State and municipal public employees in New York State have the right to negotiate terms and conditions of employment which are typically set out in a collective bargaining agreement [CBA]* pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [typically referred to as "The Taylor Law]. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:40 am
See Commonwealth of Kentucky et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 1:25 pm
In the public policy category, the Florida Supreme Court agreed with the United States Supreme Court that the twelve factors set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling last term in Alexander v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:15 am
Under the Supreme Court’s ruling last term in Alexander v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 8:23 am
Current State of Postponement Participation with the Committee is strong, and recently some collector advocates publicly called for t [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 12:38 pm
Miranda v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 7:30 am
Shaw, Thomas V. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 10:39 am
Ala. 1973), aff’d sub nom. on other grounds, Johnson’s Professional Nursing Home v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 6:25 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
The Heymann team argues that these gaps must be addressed and that states must take steps to ensure adequate enforcement of the laws. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 10:36 am
The previous iteration took place under the Biden Administration after the Supreme Court announced a two-part test in Sackett v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:37 am
To answer the dissent’s question: No, it’s not hard, yet it’s apparently still too hard for far too many services. * * * Johnson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 11:21 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2025, 12:24 pm
Relying on R v Miller II, a UK Supreme Court case invalidating a 2019 prorogation of the UK Parliament by then Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the applicants maintained that by “preventing Parliament’s ability to carry out its constitutional functions,” Trudeau exceeded his authority in proroguing the Parliament. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 7:50 am
Votes: Barrett for Grants Pass, Jackson for Johnson Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 12:40 pm
Lozeau (Child Custody; Ex Parte Interviews; Mediation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2025.html Pateras v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 8:23 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 4:23 pm
" Polak v. [read post]
