Search for: "State v. Johnstone" Results 221 - 240 of 501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2007, 3:45 am
Second, s 51(xxxi) does not appy the States; that is, the States can acquire property compulsorily without providing just terms (see Pye v Renshaw (1951) 84 CLR 58). [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 DRI had stated that it would not adopt a position of partisanship. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:25 am by Gregory Forman
 That was the holding in the January 19, 2011 Court of Appeals decision in Reiss v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
 The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
Johnston, 334 U.S. 266, (1948)); accord Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:00 pm
Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
USAA refused stating that there was doubt whether the Passenger qualified as a permissive "user" of the Johnstone vehicle. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:20 am
>> Principle of effective judicial protection does not require that national legal order provides for free-standing action>> Court again refers to Charter of Fundamental RightsIn this case, the Court was asked by the Swedish Supreme Court whether Community law required a Member State's legal order to provide for, first, a self-standing action for a declaration that a provision of its national law conflicted with Community law and, second, interim suspension… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:59 am
* In Drahos v Village of Johnston City, 80 AD2d 100, the Court held that a firefighter injured in the line of duty and unable to return to work is entitled to the full amount of his regular salary until he returns, citing Section 207-a of the General Municipal Law. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
See for example, the state’s response to the decisions in  Norris  (decriminalisation of homosexuality) Johnston (‘illegitimate’ children) and Airey (civil legal aid). [read post]