Search for: "State v. Jordan"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2013, 5:08 am
Mozes v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 12:36 pm
In March 1966 the case became part of the landmark decision, Harper v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:21 pm
Jordan, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:00 am
Jim Jordan compelling Mark Pomerantz to testify before Congress? [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
Chalabi v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 1:48 pm
State College Area Sch. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
Jordan of the United States Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, issued a rather atypical Order, at least for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
The Fourth Circuit just decided United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
Jordan, and Thompson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 10:08 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:44 am
From Alkhairy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 1:17 pm
Kumarasamy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
See Jordan v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:23 am
In Scruggs v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
” (Jordan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
") SC19135 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm
Qualified Immunity Fundamentals Qualified immunity under section 1983 is a powerful affirmative defense, protecting a state or local government official sued in an individual capacity from damages liability where the official can show that he or she acted with a reasonable belief in the constitutionality of the challenged conduct. [read post]