Search for: "State v. KAVANAUGH"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:31 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
At The New York Times, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly explore allegations of sexual misconduct against Justice Brett Kavanaugh that surfaced during Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing last year. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
I have now had a chance to review the transcript in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm
The Kavanaugh hearings became a comedy of the absurd. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 2:41 pm
I won't pretend to understand the intricate bankruptcy issues at play in Harrington v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
The Mississippi Supreme Court reversed again, this time concluding that the State violated Batson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am
Kisor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 3:31 pm
Despite the Supreme Court’s repeated exhortation that courts should not “improperly second-guess” the executive’s parole decisions, Biden, 597 U.S. at 816 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring); Harisiades v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
The state courts upheld this mandate as a neutral law under Employment Division v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:55 am
But the Ramos opinion left open the question of whether the decision applied retroactively.The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
CFPB.Judge Kavanaugh’s Dissent in PHH Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm
Notably, Judge Kavanaugh stated in a concurring opinion that the Court’s "four-factor test for awarding attorney’s fees in FOIA cases is inconsistent with FOIA’s text and structure, and impermissibly favors some FOIA plaintiffs over other equally deserving FOIA plaintiffs. [read post]
