Search for: "State v. Karel"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 4:29 pm
For a short time in 2012, Karel Zegers was the Acting President of the Victorian branch of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia (“SSAAV”). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
Karel Frielink (3 December 2017) . [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:13 am
Karel Frielink (31 August 2010) . [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:02 am
The CCJ noted that this case was similar in circumstances to the previous case of Rudisa Beverages & Juices N.V. and Caribbean International Distributors Inc. v The State of Guyana. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am
The first one is a discussion of the case of Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Louis Karel Fick by Erika de Wet. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
On June 24th 1996, the European Commission of Human Rights ruled the case Ramirez Sanchez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Whenever this is the case, the state is at the same time a major market player and an arbitrator. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 7:33 am
" Id., quoting Karel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:00 pm
Karel Frielink Attorney (Lawyer) / Partner p.s. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
A change in the progressivity of a state tax structure promotes migration and changes the allocation of resources within the state. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
