Search for: "State v. Kaster" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Seth Leventhal
(The firm’s press release, after the break) Today, the United States Supreme Court handed down an opinion in Kasten v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:45 pm
Heller Faces Class Action Suit by Laid-Off Employees [Law.com] Welch, Goodman, and Scarpa v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation are redundant of the legal malpractice claim, since they arise from the same allegations and seek identical relief (see Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 290 AD2d 399, 400 [2002]; see also Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C., 63 AD3d 529, 531 [2009]). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is axiomatic that counsel "may not shift to the client the legal responsibility it was specifically hired to undertake because of its superior knowledge" (Hart v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 211 AD2d 617, 619 [1995]). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 9:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In so ruling, the court relied upon the Superior Court decision of Peco Energy Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:49 am
That argument – whether ultimately successful or not – may state a sufficient injury under House of Representatives v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:41 am
Kaster) (hsj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2009)United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A court can find malpractice absent expert testimony where the ordinary experience of the fact finder provides a sufficient basis for judging the adequacy of the professional service (Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 259 AD2d 282, 283 [1st Dept 1999]; cf. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
A partner at Hogan Lovells and Georgetown law professor, Katyal successfully challenged Bush administration War on Terror policies in Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Estate of Neve/son v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 230 AD2d 399, 400 [I st Dept 2002).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Estate of Neve/son v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 230 AD2d 399, 400 [I st Dept 2002).) [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:25 pm by Joy Waltemath
The ruling came over five years into the litigation, after the dancers had prevailed on class certification and on their claims that they were employees under federal and state law, not independent contractors (Hart v. [read post]