Search for: "State v. Kaster"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 5:22 am
A court can find malpractice absent expert testimony where the ordinary experience of the fact finder provides a sufficient basis for judging the adequacy of the professional service (Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 259 AD2d 282, 283 [1st Dept 1999]; cf. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:48 am
By Nicholas Kaster, J.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
” (Estate of Neve/son v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 230 AD2d 399, 400 [I st Dept 2002).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
” (Estate of Neve/son v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 230 AD2d 399, 400 [I st Dept 2002).) [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Kaster and Martha C. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:46 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:05 am
A partner at Hogan Lovells and Georgetown law professor, Katyal successfully challenged Bush administration War on Terror policies in Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:49 am
That argument – whether ultimately successful or not – may state a sufficient injury under House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:25 pm
The ruling came over five years into the litigation, after the dancers had prevailed on class certification and on their claims that they were employees under federal and state law, not independent contractors (Hart v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm
Paul Lukas, a partner in the Minneapolis plaintiff’s firm Nichols Kaster who litigates class wage suits, sees little promise here. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Taylor V. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:07 am
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 pm
” Wal-Mart v Dukes. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
The causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation are redundant of the legal malpractice claim, since they arise from the same allegations and seek identical relief (see Estate of Nevelson v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 290 AD2d 399, 400 [2002]; see also Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C., 63 AD3d 529, 531 [2009]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:04 am
Kaster and C. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
(The firm’s press release, after the break) Today, the United States Supreme Court handed down an opinion in Kasten v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:09 am
It is axiomatic that counsel "may not shift to the client the legal responsibility it was specifically hired to undertake because of its superior knowledge" (Hart v Carro, Spanbock, Kaster & Cuiffo, 211 AD2d 617, 619 [1995]). [read post]