Search for: "State v. Kelley"
Results 21 - 40
of 465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2024, 10:22 am
An example would be where the landlord gets the year wrong, as in Pease v Carter (where a notice of possession proceedings served on 7th November 2018 stated that court proceedings would not begin until after 26th November 2017, an obvious typographical error). [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Cir. 1973). 5 United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm
Section V muddles our picture with two stories of the Supreme Court serving as a roadblock to addressing persistent women’s rights concerns. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Hammond of counsel), for Kelley Loveless, respondent. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Hammond of counsel), for Kelley Loveless, respondent. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case Texas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
Kelley Drye published my backgrounder on the proposal here. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
United States patents are generally territorial. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
JASON KELLEY Wow. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:26 am
In Sampson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Adkins, she writes was “a fork in the road between Alice Paul and Florence Kelley. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1544 (Fed. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538 (Fed. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
On November 7, the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) 2023 Consumer Protection Fall Conference held its public day with a number of substantive and interesting discussions about the current state of consumer protection enforcement by the FTC and, of course, state AGs. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Kelley v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
