Search for: "State v. Kelly"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
But here President Trump's stated rationale is all about the viewpoints that Harvard expresses, perpetuates, or protects.) * * * Dear Chairman Lewis, Ranking Member Kelly, and Members of the Committee: Many thanks for inviting me to testify about "How the Tax Code Subsidizes Hate. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:46 pm
In U.S. courts, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 7:05 pm
Ortiz of the motion to dismiss in Kelly Roberts v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 10:01 am
In Corbello v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 8:16 am
Criminal law — Right of confrontation — Sentencing After a trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, the jury found Charles Edward Kelly, Jr., appellant, guilty of first-degree […] [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
United States, a 1935 case upholding for-cause removal protections for independent agencies, and Seila Law v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 6:57 pm
Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro M. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
” Although the Court in Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 9:53 am
The Board's stated justification is the kind of viewpoint discrimination proscribed by the Court in Rosenberger v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:13 am
They also present a direct challenge to Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:13 am
They also present a direct challenge to Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 11:47 am
As least one of the removed FTC commissioners has stated his plans to sue. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
Kelly Tyko reports for Axios. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:43 am
Kelly, 397 US 254 (1970). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:02 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 4:12 am
In Billings v Billings Properties, Inc. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 12:27 pm
From Copeland v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly 8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
” Therefore, the resignation could not be withdrawn without the board’s consent.In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly 8 the decision reports that the then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
