Search for: "State v. Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 2,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.): Trump’s tweet praising Georgia’s then-incumbent senator appears in redacted form in the brief [pp. 24, 28, 108, 117, 118] (P29) Shaye Moss: One of the Georgia election workers Giuliani defamed before the Georgia legislature [pp. 25, 26] (P30) Ruby Freeman: Her mother, also a Georgia election worker [pp. 25, 26, 29] (P31) Cleta Mitchell: The Trump attorney’s appearance on the call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is quoted… [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:26 am by INFORRM
’ Section (iv) usefully reviews the current position on SLAPP legislation in Dublin and London, and invokes the judgment in Kelly v O’Doherty (see here for commentary) to discuss the costs deterrent associated with defending SLAPPs, while section (ii) also articulates the potential practical challenge of obtaining collaborative support from the Department of Justice and the Executive to realise legislative movement on the issue. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
  (Applause.)Let me ask you: Are you ready to elect Kamala Harris and Tim Walz president and vice president of the United States? [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 12:16 pm by Mac Kelly
By Mac Kelly On Aug. 7, 2024, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in Kyser v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:59 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a preliminary injunction in the case of Properties of the Villages Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm by Macy Berryman
Prior to the 2021 decision in Google v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm by centerforartlaw
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:55 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Kelly Park Hills, Inc., 542 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (stating that a novation must be supported by valid consideration, and finding that a promise to perform an act that a party was already obligated to perform did not constitute valid consideration). [read post]