Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 181 - 200 of 1,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2020, 10:18 am by Nedim Malovic
However, the exercise of that freedom may be subject to restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, with regard to (among other things) the rights of others.As a matter of principle, it is important to recall that the ECHR regulates a state's obligations to individuals and does not have a direct effect on the civil liability in proceedings between individuals.When it comes to criminal liability for copyright infringement, the European… [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Front Pages   PDFArticle How the New Deal Became a Raw Deal for Indian Nations: Justice Stanley Reed and the Tee-Hit-Ton Decision on Indian Title – Kent McNeil   PDF Comments Keeping Cultural Bias Out of the Courtroom: How ICWA “Qualified Expert Witnesses” Make a Difference – Elizabeth Low   PDF Being Uighur . . . with “Chinese Characteristics”: Analyzing China’s Legal Crusade… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger adds to the list of possible cases to replace Mathena v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger hopes that the Supreme Court will move quickly to replace Mathena v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Court grants review of two cases, likely to be among the term’s more important for business, to clarify the limits of state court personal jurisdiction when none of defendants’ actions relevant to the dispute took place in the state [Jim Beck on Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:27 am by Dan Filler
In conjunction with Professor Laura Napoli Coordes of the Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Professor Andrew Dawson of the University of Miami Law School, Professor Adrian Walters of IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, and Professor Christoph Henkel of the Mississippi College School of Law, the members of the Arizona State University Corporate and Business Law Journal are organizing the symposium. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
In the CNBC report, Mary Himmelstein, an assistant professor at Kent State University, explained that usually, as people interact more with those who are different from themselves and form relationships, bias tends to lessen, but that’s not happening with weight bias. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
In the CNBC report, Mary Himmelstein, an assistant professor at Kent State University, explained that usually, as people interact more with those who are different from themselves and form relationships, bias tends to lessen, but that’s not happening with weight bias. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Kent (Southern District of Texas) was impeached for sexually assaulting his female legal aides and then lying about it to the FBI and the Justice Department. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At ReligiousLiberty.TV, Michael Peabody notes that “[t]he Solicitor General … has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider [Patterson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]