Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 321 - 340 of 1,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:34 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Van Ingen, in which Chancellor Kent discussed the Privileges and Immunities Clause briefly. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law of conviction, and Jesner v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Nahmod, Chicago-Kent College of Law, has posted Section 1983 Is Born: The Supreme Court Stories of Tenney v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Breen, European Non-Profit Oversight: The Case for Regulating from the Outside In, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, 2016, Forthcoming). [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:15 am by Adrian Miedema
The Corporation of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent v A Director under the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 2017 CanLII 74130 (ON LRB)   [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court has decided to take up the case of Berghuis v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Missud v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Carolyn Shapiro is a professor of law and founder and co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, and she is of counsel at Schnapper-Casteras PLLC. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
  He's talking about this one:  the state court judge in Idaho.Though both of 'em have the middle initial R.And, to my knowledge, have never been seen together in the same room.I'm thinking a Clark Kent/Superman thing.P.S. - On a serious note, check out this line from Judge Betty Fletcher's dissent:  "I am shocked by the conduct in this case. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on Wearry v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:26 am
Here, at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the Supreme Court's dismissal of Roper v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Kent affects only states with statutes granting some kind of immunity subject to a fraud-on-the-FDA exception. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Foley (Ohio State University College of Law) has posted The Founders’ Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Amy Howe
Hodges, holding that states must license marriages between same-sex couples, continues to spawn coverage and commentary. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
We argued that, in both the old and new world, agency head final-decisionmaking authority remains the standard (and preferred) model—something the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]