Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2006, 3:46 pm
The oral argument in Clark County Council v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
Of course, Kent is quite correct when he states that this attitude is not universal. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:09 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
Briefly: In Mayer Brown’s Meaningful Discussions blog, Roger Abbott looks at the court’s opinion last week in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Plaintiff’s status as a self-represented litigant does not alter this analysis (see Matter of Kent v Kent, 29 AD3d 123, 130-31 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 3:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Court vacated the sentence of the Kent Circuit Court in People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
Supreme Court decision in 2010 striking down federal limits on corporate and union political spending doesn’t apply to similar state laws. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:22 pm
Last I looked, the Sixth Circuit, for example, was saying that all its sister circuits had rejected it, United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger hopes that the Supreme Court will move quickly to replace Mathena v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
