Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 721 - 740 of 1,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that death row inmate Warren Lee Hill has filed a petition seeking review of the Georgia Supreme Court’s ruling against him in his “challenge to the state law providing confidentiality to the suppliers of the drugs used for lethal injection. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm by Bill Otis
 At no point has the United States ever executed more than a tiny fraction of one percent of its murderers. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:46 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an update on Ryan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:18 pm by Joshua Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States, as recently as this past term in Bond v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:22 am by Larisa Vaysman
The Court said that the “purpose” of § 1133 was “that the claimant be notified of the reasons for the denial of the claim and have a fair opportunity for review,” and interpreted this to apply to judicial review (quoting Kent v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am by Bill Otis
 One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:49 am by Amy Howe
    Briefly: At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses yesterday’s order directing Esteban Martinez to file a response to the state’s petition for rehearing in Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Alice Woolley
And while occupying that role Robidoux violated the key ethical duties that lawyers owe: loyalty, confidentiality and candour (See, e.g., R. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:13 am by Dan Markel
(Rachel asked to also thank UVA law librarian Kent Olson for his help with the underlying research). -- In light of the likely significance of the Court's opinion in Riley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Medtonic, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) and Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
William Brutocao and Eric Bjorgum, lead trial attorney and team member in the case of the famed Los Angeles mural of Ed Ruscha by Kent Twitchell point out that “a mural is [a] piece of property comprising separate ownership rights of title, possession, copyright and moral rights”. [read post]