Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm
For example, in Dynatec Mining Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
An 1874 law banned arms carrying on election day in Kent County. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Kent Police have apologised to journalist photographer Andy Aitchison for his arrest while covering a Covid-hit asylum centre in Kent, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 3:14 pm
"] From McGee v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:38 pm
” Lynge v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
We argued that, in both the old and new world, agency head final-decisionmaking authority remains the standard (and preferred) model—something the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The 2020 Chicago-Kent College of Law Roy C. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The Appellant, the Kent branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), filed a claim for statutory review under section 113 of the 2004 Act challenging the adoption of the Policy. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor, heard 30… [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Second, Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
2299, 2317 (2021); Michael Kent Curtis & Eugene D. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Third, R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
