Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 901 - 920 of 1,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am by NL
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  “Is” easier to satisfy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:58 am by Lawrence Solum
Michael Kent Curtis (Wake Forest University - School of Law) has posted Citizens United and Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Kent Berk
State, summarized by Scottsdale, Arizona estate and inheritance lawyer, Kent Berk. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Kent Berk
State, summarized by Scottsdale, Arizona estate and inheritance lawyer, Kent Berk. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by Bill Otis
  It was only in 1971, in Santobello v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
United States, involving the federal harmless error rule, and Reichle v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:20 pm by Don Cruse
Some of those claims made it to the Texas Supreme Court in Jefferson State Bank v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
What about Oliver Wendell Holmes’s editing of Kent’s Commentaries on American Law (12th ed., 1873)? [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences argues that the Court’s denial of a stay of execution to Texas murderer Keith Thurmond bodes well for Arizona’s position in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:17 am
  He's talking about this one:  the state court judge in Idaho.Though both of 'em have the middle initial R.And, to my knowledge, have never been seen together in the same room.I'm thinking a Clark Kent/Superman thing.P.S. - On a serious note, check out this line from Judge Betty Fletcher's dissent:  "I am shocked by the conduct in this case. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
At Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger discusses the Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am by Steve Erickson
United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) eviscerates Washington v. [read post]