Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
IPSO 06393-21 Minto v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 01933-21 Muslim Council of Britain v thejc.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02814-21 Kent v straffordshire-live.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019). 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 07428-21 Daunt v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after… [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Birdthistle (Chicago-Kent College of Law) and Quinn Curtis (University of Virginia), on Monday, December 6, 2021 Tags: Conflicts of interest, DOL, ERISA, Fiduciary rule, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Prudence, Retirement plans, Securities regulation U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:12 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 8:48 am
Rather, it stated that "A plain reading of the regulation supports Kent's position. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 2:18 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Graham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm
For example, in Dynatec Mining Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
An 1874 law banned arms carrying on election day in Kent County. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Kent Police have apologised to journalist photographer Andy Aitchison for his arrest while covering a Covid-hit asylum centre in Kent, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 3:14 pm
"] From McGee v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:38 pm
” Lynge v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
We argued that, in both the old and new world, agency head final-decisionmaking authority remains the standard (and preferred) model—something the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The 2020 Chicago-Kent College of Law Roy C. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The Appellant, the Kent branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), filed a claim for statutory review under section 113 of the 2004 Act challenging the adoption of the Policy. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Coogan v. [read post]
