Search for: "State v. Kent" Results 141 - 160 of 1,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:51 pm by Jeff Gittins
In July 2019, the Utah Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and that it has agreed to revisit next Term in Fulton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Lecturer on the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At the Crime & Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger opines on the criminal-law implications of Thursday’s McGirt ruling. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:40 pm by Schachtman
In the United States, the President awards the National Medal of Freedom. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
He repeatedly uses terms like enlisting the state to “stamp out any subculture and make its members outcasts. [read post]
27 May 2020, 4:29 pm by Georgialee Lang
Justice Kent reviewed the law with respect to the court’s discretion with respect to adjournments, citing Navarro v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 5:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Municipality: Indigenous Land Recovery, Settler Resentment, and Taxation on the Oneida Reservation, NAIS: Native American and Indigenous Studies Kent McNeil, The Louisiana Purchase: Indian and American Sovereignty in the Missouri Watershed, Western Historical Quarterly Robert Miller, American Indian Sovereignty versus the United States, The Routledge Handbook of Critical Indigenous Studies [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:58 am by Jacquelyn Greene
While this order expires on May 1, 2020, it explicitly states that the Chief Justice fully expects to extend the directives for an additional 30 days and that judicial officials should expect the directives in the order to last throughout May 2020. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that “[w]henever the Supreme Court makes a significant change in the law — as it did last week when it overruled its prior approval of nonunanimous juries in state criminal cases” in Ramos v. [read post]