Search for: "State v. Kimbel"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 8:34 pm
Kimbell, Civil No. 07-1871-HA. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In this case involving the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act, Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (collectively Wilderness Watch) brought suit against Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service, and Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (collectively Forest Service), alleging that the Forest Service's decision to construct a certain snowmobile trail between… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm
In July 2004, the United States Forest Service issued a Land and Resource Management Plan for the Superior National Forest (the forest plan). [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Kimbell et al, Civil No. 07-1871-SU,, 2008 WL 4186913 (D.Or. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Kimbell Foods, federal law frequently incorporates state property law and state contract law. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Stuart v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm
Kimbell Foods, which requires courts crafting federal common law to incorporate state standards unless there is a good reason to create nationally uniform standards. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 12:05 pm
Kimbell et al. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
In one case, the Court held that federal tax lien has priority over the simultaneous state and private liens (United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:49 am
Silvers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Paul Guardian Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
Gaughan v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
If you want a break from politics, however, we can take you back to the normal state of things (i.e., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
