Search for: "State v. King" Results 41 - 60 of 5,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2024, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (CPLR 3113 (d] emphasis added]) “Absent [as here] a stipulation between the parties to conduct a deposition remotely, a party seeking the remote deposition must demonstrate that the party would encounter undue hardship from submitting to an in-person deposition in New York State” (Rubin v Sabharwal, 70 Misc3d 1216[A] [Sup Ct, NY Cnty 2021] [emphasis added] citing Rogovin v Rogovin, 3 AD3d 352 [1st Dept 2004]; see Yu Hui Chen v Chen Li Zhi,… [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 4:33 pm by Bill Marler
Listeria is a gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium that is ubiquitous and can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
According to the opinion, the plaintiff slipped and fell at a Burger King and, thereafter, filed a negligence lawsuit against the operators of the restaurant.The plaintiff filed her complaint within the two-year statute of limitations. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith and Desmond King, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect versus Repair (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Alexandra Filindra In America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 6:48 am by Bill Marler
  In the representative case of Pfeffer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
A virtual tour of Hawaii's King Kamehameha V Judiciary History Center (KHON). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Karen B. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 10:40 am by Scott Bomboy
The case is one of the first major tests of the court’s new approach to deciding Establishment Clause cases as stated in Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, there was also a hearing in the case of Aboyami v Kings College London & Aboyami v CIFAS and application in the case of Centreview Partners v Ajikawo KB-2024-002080. [read post]