Search for: "State v. Knight"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Mezey v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
Background: The Schrems II Decision and the End of Privacy Shield The executive order and accompanying DOJ regulations are intended to facilitate a new EU–U.S. data-transfer agreement, following the July 2020 decision by the CJEU in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 1:26 pm
Thompson revisited : Ramirez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Flinkkilä v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
& Tech. __ (forthcoming 2022) The United States’ Approach to “Platform” Regulation Other Articles and Advocacy Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Aug. 23, 2022 The Plan to Blow Up the Internet, Ostensibly to Protect Kids Online (regarding AB 2273), Capitol Weekly, Aug. 18, 2022 The Story Behind the Lessons from the First Internet Ages Project (with Mary Anne Franks), Knight Foundation, June… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 8:42 pm
Knight v Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, 572 F. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 10:20 am
It was clear from Knight v Vale Royal BC (2004) HLR 9 that even 6 months occupation under an AST was ‘likely to be settled not temporary’. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
Two state troopers, Lt. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
Mariya Knight reports for CNN. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
”” In Lindke v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:34 am
[1] LCX AG v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
