Search for: "State v. Kong " Results 121 - 140 of 858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Pittsburgh Tax Review, Forthcoming).From SSRN (Islamic Law):Mushtaq Ahmad, Revisiting the Discourse on Islam and Human Rights, (November 21, 2019).Muhtaq Ahmad, Discovering the Law without a Coherent Legal Theory: The Case of the Council of Islamic Ideology, (November 19, 2019).Ashraf Booley, Progressive Realisation of Muslim Family Law: The Case of Tunisia, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2019).Recent Books:Nathan Walker, The First Amendment and State Bans on… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 7:22 am
The incoherent manner in which tribunals have resolved these questions makes their significance unpredictable, including in the Philip Morris v Asia case currently underway under the Hong Kong-Australia Bilateral Investment Treaty. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:26 pm
Repousis, State Succession and Devolution Agreements Revisited: A Note on Sanum v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 8:03 am
Tianbao Qin & Jin Gu, Payments for ecosystem services in transboundary water allocation cases: An approach for China and its neighbours Owen McIntyre, State responsibility in international law for transboundary water‐related harm: The emergence of a new ecosystems‐based paradigm? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:10 am by Phil
Failing to locate SEB's patent, the attorney issued an opinion letter stating that Pentalpha's deep fryer did not infringe any of the patents that he had found. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:22 pm by Guangjian Tu
The court deferred to an official letter provided by the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Department in Mainland China. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
The majority states that the specification did not define transverse and perpendicular to be coequal in meaning. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However he stated that the important question was whether the viewers in the UK were “customers”, as reputation alone was not enough; he therefore dismissed the claim, as did the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Factual BackgroundSky's Now TV logo in 2012Starbucks was part of a group called PCCM which had been running its service NOW TV in Hong Kong under that name since 2006 and was the largest pay TV operator in Hong Kong by 2012 when this litigation commenced. [read post]
Case date: 20 April 2022 Case number: No. 18-916 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]